Raising the Walls Again

Restoration here began with a drone photograph of a foundation and a decision not to build something merely in the spirit of an adobe. The work underway uses adobe brick on the recovered stone — short walls, the character of the original house, not a full theatrical replica. Mortar that looks blueish when wet dries toward light gray. The bricks, made to the old proportion, were supplied by San Tan Adobe. The knoll remains the knoll. Alexa Clausen’s distinction is the one that matters on a historic site: the stone foundation is a restoration. The walls are a reconstruction. A dream, and a discipline. There is a local reason for the discipline. The other adobe homesteads of this canyon — Connors, Lusardi, Capt. Albert Smith — did not keep their walls. This is the one that kept its stones. The photographs below are a first sequence of that work, from the exposed stones in January 2026 to the paver floor in October.

The work, in order

1 of 39

PrevNext

1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
16. 
17. 
18. 
19. 
20. 
21. 
22. 
23. 
24. 
25. 
26. 
27. 
28. 
29. 
30. 
31. 
32. 
33. 
34. 
35. 
36. 
37. 
38. 
39. 

Arrow keys move the sequence.

The walls and the stone were laid by Audel Nava of ANV Masonry. Greg interviewed many masons. Few had worked adobe brick. Fewer had laid a rock foundation. Audel walked the knoll, said he had been doing this work since he was a kid, and was hired that day. Anyone with a real job of adobe or stone can write the ranch. We pass those notes on. His number is not on this page.

Partial is not a lack. A complete replica would overwrite the ruin photographs and the excavation units. A neglected foundation would go back under grass. The middle path is stewardship: make the footprint readable to a visitor, protect what the field school recorded, and let the building be a place people can stand at a wedding or a dinner without forgetting who paid to raise it in 1897. On that footprint, the westernmost wing was the School Teacher’s Room — the small living space readied that summer for the young woman who boarded with the Dears, at twenty dollars a month, while she taught the Aliso term.

The same ground now holds a working vineyard, a broad lawn, a pool, a game court, and a lodging suite. Those uses are not a betrayal of the homestead. Aliso was always a working landscape that also received people — sons, a teacher who boarded, neighbors, the occasional protest. What has changed is the invitation. Micro weddings, small parties, and quiet dinners are a way for the county to be in the house again, briefly, as guests.

Historic-site designation is being pursued with the care it requires: CEQA cultural-resource review, comparisons to places such as Bumann Ranch, honesty about building codes and wall heights. The research archive — maps, photographs, the 1898 neighborhood record, Palomar’s notes, Hagen’s thesis, Alexa Clausen’s years of documents — is the same archive this website draws on. Publication, here, means putting that work where a neighbor can read it.

The view south is still the Escondido Creek Conservancy’s — the land beyond the ranch, and the meandering creek. The olives are still the homestead’s. The name on this site is still Aliso, whatever San Elijo and El Aliso each contributed. The rest is work: clay, water, time, and the decision, each season, to keep the line of stones a house.